-->

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Comprehensive Guide to Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)

 



Introduction

An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) is a security technology that monitors network traffic and system activities for malicious actions or policy violations. It plays a crucial role in modern cybersecurity infrastructure by providing real-time monitoring, analysis, and alerting of security threats.


What is an IDS?

An IDS is a device or software application that monitors network or system activities for malicious activities or policy violations. It collects and analyzes information from various areas within a computer or network to identify possible security breaches, which include both intrusions (attacks from outside the organization) and misuse (attacks from within the organization).



Components of an IDS

  1. Sensors/Agents: Collect traffic and activity data
  2. Analysis Engine: Processes collected data to identify suspicious activities
  3. Signature Database: Contains patterns of known attacks
  4. Alert Generator: Creates and sends alerts when threats are detected
  5. Management Interface: Allows configuration and monitoring of the system

Types of IDS

1. Network-based IDS (NIDS)

  • Monitors network traffic for suspicious activity
  • Placed at strategic points within the network
  • Analyzes passing traffic on entire subnet
  • Examples: Snort, Suricata

2. Host-based IDS (HIDS)

  • Monitors individual host activities
  • Analyzes system calls, file system changes, log files
  • Examples: OSSEC, Tripwire

3. Protocol-based IDS (PIDS)

  • Monitors and analyzes communication protocols
  • Installed on web servers or critical protocol servers
  • Focuses on HTTP, FTP, DNS protocols

4. Application Protocol-based IDS (APIDS)

  • Monitors specific application protocols
  • Analyzes application-specific protocols
  • Examples: Web application firewalls

Detection Methods

1. Signature-based Detection

  • Uses known patterns of malicious behavior
  • High accuracy for known threats
  • Limited effectiveness against new attacks

2. Anomaly-based Detection

  • Creates baseline of normal behavior
  • Detects deviations from normal patterns
  • Better at identifying new threats

3. Hybrid Detection

  • Combines signature and anomaly detection
  • Provides comprehensive protection
  • Reduces false positives

Use Cases

  1. Network Security Monitoring
    • Continuous monitoring of network traffic
    • Detection of unauthorized access attempts
    • Identification of policy violations
  2. Compliance Requirements
    • Meeting regulatory standards (HIPAA, PCI DSS)
    • Audit trail maintenance
    • Security policy enforcement
  3. Threat Hunting
    • Proactive security investigation
    • Identification of advanced persistent threats
    • Analysis of security incidents
  4. Incident Response
    • Real-time alert generation
    • Automated response capabilities
    • Forensic analysis support

Problems IDS Solves

  1. Security Visibility
    • Provides detailed insight into network activities
    • Identifies suspicious patterns
    • Monitors system behaviors
  2. Threat Detection
    • Identifies known attack patterns
    • Detects zero-day exploits
    • Recognizes policy violations
  3. Compliance Management
    • Ensures regulatory compliance
    • Maintains security standards
    • Documents security events
  4. Incident Response
    • Enables quick threat response
    • Provides forensic information
    • Supports investigation processes

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages

  1. Real-time Detection
    • Immediate threat identification
    • Quick response capabilities
    • Continuous monitoring
  2. Comprehensive Monitoring
    • Network-wide visibility
    • Detailed activity logs
    • Pattern recognition
  3. Customizable Rules
    • Adaptable to environment
    • Flexible configuration
    • Scalable implementation

Disadvantages

  1. False Positives
    • Can generate unnecessary alerts
    • Requires tuning and optimization
    • May overwhelm security teams
  2. Resource Intensive
    • High processing requirements
    • Network performance impact
    • Storage needs for logs
  3. Maintenance Overhead
    • Regular updates needed
    • Signature maintenance
    • Configuration management

Popular IDS Solutions Comparison

1. Snort

  • Type: Network-based
  • License: Open Source
  • Strengths:
    • Large community
    • Extensive rule set
    • High flexibility
  • Weaknesses:
    • Complex configuration
    • Performance limitations
    • Limited GUI

2. Suricata

  • Type: Network-based
  • License: Open Source
  • Strengths:
    • Multi-threading support
    • High performance
    • Modern architecture
  • Weaknesses:
    • Resource intensive
    • Learning curve
    • Limited documentation

3. OSSEC

  • Type: Host-based
  • License: Open Source
  • Strengths:
    • Cross-platform support
    • File integrity monitoring
    • Log analysis
  • Weaknesses:
    • Complex deployment
    • Limited GUI
    • Steep learning curve

4. Security Onion

  • Type: Hybrid
  • License: Open Source
  • Strengths:
    • All-in-one solution
    • Multiple tool integration
    • Good visualization
  • Weaknesses:
    • Resource heavy
    • Complex setup
    • Requires expertise

Best Practices for IDS Implementation

  1. Strategic Placement
    • Position sensors appropriately
    • Consider network architecture
    • Monitor critical segments
  2. Proper Configuration
    • Regular rule updates
    • Tuning for environment
    • Performance optimization
  3. Integration
    • Connect with SIEM systems
    • Integrate with incident response
    • Coordinate with other security tools
  4. Maintenance
    • Regular updates
    • Performance monitoring
    • Rule optimization

Conclusion

Intrusion Detection Systems are crucial components of modern cybersecurity infrastructure. While they present certain challenges, their benefits in providing network visibility and threat detection make them essential for organizations of all sizes. The key to successful IDS implementation lies in proper planning, regular maintenance, and integration with other security measures.

Monday, November 18, 2024

Understanding TLS vs mTLS

 


Introduction

In today's digital landscape, secure communication is paramount. Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Mutual TLS (mTLS) are two crucial protocols that ensure secure data transmission between systems. This article explores both protocols in depth, their differences, implementations, and best practices.

Transport Layer Security (TLS)

TLS Architecture Diagram


What is TLS?

TLS is a cryptographic protocol designed to provide secure communication over a computer network. It's the successor to SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and is widely used for securing web traffic (HTTPS).

How TLS Works

  1. Client Hello: Client initiates connection with supported cipher suites
  2. Server Hello: Server selects cipher suite and sends certificate
  3. Certificate Verification: Client verifies server's certificate
  4. Key Exchange: Secure session key establishment
  5. Secure Communication: Encrypted data transfer begins

Mutual Transport Layer Security (MTLS)

Mutual TLS Architecture Diagram



What is mTLS?

mTLS extends TLS by requiring both the client and server to verify each other's certificates, providing two-way authentication.

How mTLS Works

  1. Initial Handshake: Similar to TLS
  2. Server Authentication: Client verifies server certificate
  3. Client Authentication: Server requests and verifies client certificate
  4. Mutual Verification: Both parties validate each other
  5. Secure Channel: Established after mutual validation

Implementation Examples

TLS Implementation (Node.js)

const https = require('https'); const fs = require('fs'); const options = { key: fs.readFileSync('server-key.pem'), cert: fs.readFileSync('server-cert.pem') }; https.createServer(options, (req, res) => { res.writeHead(200); res.end('Secure server running!\n'); }).listen(8443);

mTLS Implementation (Node.js)

const https = require('https'); const fs = require('fs'); const options = { key: fs.readFileSync('server-key.pem'), cert: fs.readFileSync('server-cert.pem'), ca: [fs.readFileSync('client-ca.pem')], requestCert: true, // Require client certificate rejectUnauthorized: true // Reject invalid certificates }; https.createServer(options, (req, res) => { res.writeHead(200); res.end('Secure mTLS server running!\n'); }).listen(8443);

Key Differences


Advantages and Disadvantages

TLS

Advantages

  • Simpler implementation
  • Widely supported
  • Lower overhead
  • Sufficient for public-facing services

Disadvantages

  • Only server authentication
  • No client verification
  • Potentially vulnerable to certain attacks

mTLS

Advantages

  • Mutual authentication
  • Higher security
  • Perfect for zero-trust architectures
  • Better protection against MITM attacks

Disadvantages

  • More complex setup
  • Certificate management overhead
  • Higher latency
  • Requires client certificate distribution

Best Practices and Considerations

  1. Certificate Management
    • Implement proper certificate rotation
    • Use strong encryption algorithms
    • Maintain secure certificate storage
  2. Security Measures
    • Enable perfect forward secrecy
    • Use modern cipher suites
    • Implement certificate pinning
  3. Implementation Guidelines
    • Regular security audits
    • Proper error handling
    • Robust certificate validation

Limitations

TLS Limitations

  • No client authentication
  • Vulnerable to certain MITM attacks
  • Certificate trust chain complexity

mTLS Limitations

  • Increased operational complexity
  • Certificate distribution challenges
  • Higher maintenance overhead
  • Performance impact

Conclusion

Choose between TLS and mTLS based on your security requirements, infrastructure complexity, and use case. While TLS is suitable for public-facing services, mTLS provides additional security for internal services and zero-trust environments. Proper implementation and maintenance are crucial for both protocols.


Sunday, November 10, 2024

Streaming vs Messaging: Understanding Modern Data Integration Patterns

In today's distributed systems landscape, two prominent patterns have emerged for real-time data transfer: streaming and messaging. While both facilitate real-time data movement, they serve different purposes and come with their own sets of advantages and trade-offs. Let's dive deep into understanding these patterns.

1. Core Concepts



Streaming

  • Continuous flow of data
  • Typically handles high-volume, time-series data
  • Focus on data pipelines and processing
  • Examples: Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, Apache Storm

Messaging




  • Discrete messages between systems
  • Event-driven communication
  • Focus on system integration
  • Examples: RabbitMQ, Apache ActiveMQ, Redis Pub/Sub

2. Architectural Patterns

Streaming Architecture


[Producer] → [Stream] → [Stream Processor] → [Consumer] ↓ [Storage Layer]

Key Components:

  • Producer: Generates continuous data
  • Stream: Ordered sequence of records
  • Stream Processor: Transforms/analyzes data in motion
  • Consumer: Processes the transformed data
  • Storage Layer: Persists data for replay/analysis

Messaging Architecture


[Publisher] → [Message Broker] → [Subscriber] ↓ [Message Queue]

Key Components:

  • Publisher: Sends discrete messages
  • Message Broker: Routes messages
  • Subscriber: Receives and processes messages
  • Message Queue: Temporary storage for messages

3. Implementation Examples

Streaming Example (Apache Kafka)


// Producer Properties props = new Properties(); props.put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092"); props.put("key.serializer", "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer"); props.put("value.serializer", "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringSerializer"); Producer<String, String> producer = new KafkaProducer<>(props); producer.send(new ProducerRecord<>("sensor-data", "temperature", "25.5")); // Consumer Properties consumerProps = new Properties(); consumerProps.put("bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092"); consumerProps.put("group.id", "sensor-group"); consumerProps.put("key.deserializer", "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer"); consumerProps.put("value.deserializer", "org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer"); KafkaConsumer<String, String> consumer = new KafkaConsumer<>(consumerProps); consumer.subscribe(Arrays.asList("sensor-data")); while (true) { ConsumerRecords<String, String> records = consumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(100)); for (ConsumerRecord<String, String> record : records) { System.out.println("Received: " + record.value()); } }

Messaging Example (RabbitMQ)


# Publisher import pika connection = pika.BlockingConnection(pika.ConnectionParameters('localhost')) channel = connection.channel() channel.queue_declare(queue='task_queue', durable=True) channel.basic_publish( exchange='', routing_key='task_queue', body='Process this task', properties=pika.BasicProperties(delivery_mode=2) ) # Consumer def callback(ch, method, properties, body): print(f" [x] Received {body.decode()}") # Process the message ch.basic_ack(delivery_tag=method.delivery_tag) channel.basic_qos(prefetch_count=1) channel.basic_consume(queue='task_queue', on_message_callback=callback) channel.start_consuming()

4. Use Cases

Streaming

  1. Real-time Analytics
    • Processing sensor data
    • User behavior tracking
    • Stock market data analysis
  2. Log Aggregation
    • System logs processing
    • Application monitoring
    • Security event analysis
  3. IoT Applications
    • Device telemetry
    • Smart city monitoring
    • Industrial IoT

Messaging

  1. Microservices Communication
    • Service-to-service communication
    • Async task processing
    • Distributed system integration
  2. Background Jobs
    • Email notifications
    • Report generation
    • File processing
  3. Event-Driven Architecture
    • Order processing
    • User notifications
    • Workflow management

5. Advantages and Disadvantages

Streaming

Advantages

  • High throughput for large volumes of data
  • Real-time processing capabilities
  • Built-in fault tolerance and scalability
  • Data replay capabilities
  • Perfect for time-series analysis

Disadvantages

  • More complex to set up and maintain
  • Higher resource consumption
  • Steeper learning curve
  • May be overkill for simple use cases
  • Requires careful capacity planning

Messaging

Advantages

  • Simple to implement and understand
  • Lower resource overhead
  • Better for request/reply patterns
  • Built-in message persistence
  • Flexible routing patterns

Disadvantages

  • Limited by message size
  • May not handle extremely high throughput
  • Message order not guaranteed (in some systems)
  • Potential message loss if not configured properly
  • Scale-out can be challenging

6. When to Choose What?

Choose Streaming When:

  • You need to process high-volume, real-time data
  • Data ordering is critical
  • You need replay capabilities
  • You're building data pipelines
  • You need complex event processing

Choose Messaging When:

  • You need simple async communication
  • You're building microservices
  • You need request/reply patterns
  • Message volume is moderate
  • You need flexible routing

Conclusion

Both streaming and messaging patterns have their place in modern distributed systems. The choice between them depends on your specific use case, scale requirements, and complexity tolerance. Often, large-scale systems implement both patterns to leverage their respective strengths.

Consider your requirements carefully:

  • Data volume and velocity
  • Processing requirements
  • Ordering guarantees
  • Replay needs
  • System complexity tolerance

Make an informed decision based on these factors, and don't be afraid to use both patterns where appropriate. The key is to understand their strengths and limitations to build robust, scalable systems.

#SystemDesign #SoftwareArchitecture #Streaming #Messaging #DistributedSystems #Technology #SoftwareEngineering

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

[Solved] A Complete Guide to Handling AWS Fargate Pod Evictions Building Resilient Authentication Systems with diagram and code

 

Problem Statement

Organizations running authentication services on AWS EKS Fargate face a critical challenge: when AWS initiates mandatory infrastructure patches, pods running on outdated infrastructure are evicted after the patch deadline. In traditional single-pod authentication architectures, this leads to:

  1. Complete authentication system failure
  2. All active user sessions being terminated
  3. Applications becoming inaccessible
  4. Service disruptions requiring manual intervention
  5. Loss of business continuity

This guide presents a comprehensive solution to build resilient authentication systems that maintain service availability during pod evictions.

Traditional Vulnerable Architecture



In a typical single-pod authentication setup:


# Vulnerable Deployment Configuration apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: auth-service spec: replicas: 1 # Single point of failure selector: matchLabels: app: auth-service template: spec: containers: - name: auth-service image: auth-service:latest ports: - containerPort: 8080 volumeMounts: - name: local-data mountPath: /data volumes: - name: local-data emptyDir: {} # Non-persistent storage

Problems with Traditional Architecture

In many EKS deployments, applications directly integrate with authentication services, creating several critical issues:

  1. Single Point of Failure
    • Single authentication pod serving multiple applications
    • No redundancy in authentication layer
    • Direct dependency between applications and auth service
  2. Token Management Issues
    • No shared token storage
    • Session data lost during pod evictions
    • No token persistence across pod restarts
  3. Operational Challenges
    • Manual intervention required during patches
    • Service disruption during pod evictions
    • Complex recovery procedures

Impact Analysis

When AWS initiates mandatory patches on Fargate infrastructure, the following sequence occurs:

# Timeline of Events 1. AWS Announces Patch: - Notification received - Deadline set for infrastructure update 2. Grace Period Expires: - Authentication pod marked for eviction - SIGTERM signal sent to pod 3. Service Impact: - Authentication pod terminated - All active sessions lost - Applications unable to validate tokens - New authentication requests fail 4. Cascading Failures: - Application endpoints return 401/403 errors - User sessions terminated - Backend services disrupted

Resilient Architecture Solution

Singe Region:-


Multiple Region:-



Understanding EKS Fargate Patch Management

The Patching Process

  1. Announcement Phase
    • AWS announces new patches for Fargate infrastructure
    • Notice is provided through AWS Health Dashboard and email notifications
    • A deadline is communicated (typically several weeks in advance)
    • Patches may include security updates, bug fixes, or performance improvements
  2. Grace Period
      • New pods are scheduled on the updated infrastructure
    • Existing pods continue running on the old infrastructure
    • Organizations should use this time to test and plan their migration
  3. Enforcement Phase
    • After the deadline, AWS begins evicting pods from outdated infrastructure
    • Pods receive SIGTERM signals followed by SIGKILL after grace period
    • Evictions follow Kubernetes PodDisruptionBudget rules

Migration Path

To migrate from the vulnerable architecture to a resilient solution:

  1. Phase 1: Add Redundancy
    • Deploy multiple auth pods
    • Implement load balancing
    • Add health checks
  2. Phase 2: Add Persistent Storage
    • Deploy Redis cluster
    • Configure session persistence
    • Migrate to distributed tokens
  3. Phase 3: Improve Monitoring
    • Add metrics collection
    • Implement alerting
    • Create runbooks
  4. Phase 4: Update Applications
    • Implement circuit breakers
    • Add retry mechanisms
    • Update token handling


1. Deployment Configuration


# Resilient Authentication Service Deployment apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: auth-service spec: replicas: 3 # Multiple replicas for redundancy strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxUnavailable: 0 maxSurge: 1 template: spec: affinity: podAntiAffinity: preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: - weight: 100 podAffinityTerm: topologyKey: topology.kubernetes.io/zone labelSelector: matchLabels: app: auth-service containers: - name: auth-service image: auth-service:latest env: - name: DB_HOST value: "postgres-primary" - name: REDIS_HOSTS value: "redis-0.redis:6379,redis-1.redis:6379,redis-2.redis:6379" - name: CLUSTER_ENABLED value: "true" readinessProbe: httpGet: path: /health port: 8080 initialDelaySeconds: 10 periodSeconds: 5 livenessProbe: httpGet: path: /health/live port: 8080 initialDelaySeconds: 15 periodSeconds: 10


2. Persistent Storage Configuration


# PostgreSQL StatefulSet for User Data and Configuration apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: StatefulSet metadata: name: postgres spec: serviceName: postgres replicas: 2 template: spec: containers: - name: postgres image: postgres:14 env: - name: POSTGRES_DB value: authdb - name: POSTGRES_USER valueFrom: secretKeyRef: name: db-credentials key: username volumeMounts: - name: postgres-data mountPath: /var/lib/postgresql/data volumeClaimTemplates: - metadata: name: postgres-data spec: accessModes: [ "ReadWriteOnce" ] resources: requests: storage: 20Gi


3. Session Management Configuration


# Redis Cluster for Session Management apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: StatefulSet metadata: name: redis spec: serviceName: redis replicas: 3 template: spec: containers: - name: redis image: redis:6.2 command: - redis-server - /usr/local/etc/redis/redis.conf - --cluster-enabled - "yes" ports: - containerPort: 6379 volumeMounts: - name: redis-data mountPath: /data volumeClaimTemplates: - metadata: name: redis-data spec: accessModes: [ "ReadWriteOnce" ] resources: requests: storage: 10Gi


4. Service Configuration


# Load Balanced Service apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: auth-service spec: type: ClusterIP ports: - port: 80 targetPort: 8080 selector: app: auth-service --- # Pod Disruption Budget apiVersion: policy/v1 kind: PodDisruptionBudget metadata: name: auth-pdb spec: minAvailable: 2 selector: matchLabels: app: auth-service

Implementation Details

1. Authentication Service Code


// Session management implementation class SessionManager { private redisCluster: IORedis.Cluster; constructor() { this.redisCluster = new IORedis.Cluster( process.env.REDIS_HOSTS.split(',').map(host => ({ host: host.split(':')[0], port: parseInt(host.split(':')[1]) })) ); } async storeSession(sessionId: string, data: SessionData): Promise<void> { await this.redisCluster.set( `session:${sessionId}`, JSON.stringify(data), 'EX', 3600 // 1 hour expiry ); } async getSession(sessionId: string): Promise<SessionData | null> { const data = await this.redisCluster.get(`session:${sessionId}`); return data ? JSON.parse(data) : null; } }

2. Database Schema


-- User and configuration management CREATE TABLE users ( id UUID PRIMARY KEY, username VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE, email VARCHAR(255), created_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE, last_modified TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE ); CREATE TABLE configuration ( key VARCHAR(255) PRIMARY KEY, value JSONB, last_modified TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE ); CREATE TABLE roles ( id UUID PRIMARY KEY, name VARCHAR(255) UNIQUE, permissions JSONB );

3. Health Check Implementation


class HealthCheck { async checkHealth(): Promise<HealthStatus> { const dbHealth = await this.checkDatabase(); const redisHealth = await this.checkRedis(); const systemHealth = await this.checkSystem(); return { status: dbHealth.healthy && redisHealth.healthy && systemHealth.healthy ? 'healthy' : 'unhealthy', components: { database: dbHealth, redis: redisHealth, system: systemHealth } }; } }

Deployment Process

  1. Initial Setup

# Deploy storage layer kubectl apply -f postgres-statefulset.yaml kubectl apply -f redis-cluster.yaml # Deploy authentication service kubectl apply -f auth-deployment.yaml kubectl apply -f auth-service.yaml kubectl apply -f auth-pdb.yaml
  1. Verification

# Verify pod distribution kubectl get pods -o wide # Check cluster health kubectl exec -it redis-0 -- redis-cli cluster info kubectl exec -it postgres-0 -- psql -U auth_user -c "SELECT pg_is_in_recovery();"

Benefits of Resilient Architecture

  1. Zero-Downtime Operations
    • Continuous service during pod evictions
    • Automatic session migration
    • No manual intervention required
  2. High Availability
    • Multiple authentication pods
    • Distributed session storage
    • Replicated configuration data
  3. Scalability
    • Horizontal scaling capability
    • Load distribution
    • Resource optimization
  4. Maintenance Benefits
    • Easy updates and patches
    • No service disruption
    • Automatic failover

Building Resilient Applications

1. Implement Graceful Shutdown Handling


# Example Python application with Kubernetes-aware shutdown import signal import time import sys from kubernetes import client, config class Application: def __init__(self): self.running = True signal.signal(signal.SIGTERM, self.handle_sigterm) def handle_sigterm(self, signum, frame): print("Received SIGTERM signal") self.running = False self.graceful_shutdown() def graceful_shutdown(self): print("Starting graceful shutdown...") # 1. Stop accepting new requests # 2. Wait for ongoing requests to complete # 3. Close database connections time.sleep(10) # Give time for load balancer to deregister print("Shutdown complete") sys.exit(0) app = Application()

2. State Management

# Example StatefulSet for stateful applications apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: StatefulSet metadata: name: stateful-app spec: serviceName: stateful-service replicas: 3 selector: matchLabels: app: stateful-app template: metadata: labels: app: stateful-app spec: containers: - name: app image: stateful-app:1.0 volumeMounts: - name: data mountPath: /data volumeClaimTemplates: - metadata: name: data spec: accessModes: [ "ReadWriteOnce" ] resources: requests: storage: 1Gi

Monitoring and Observability


apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1 kind: PrometheusRule metadata: name: auth-alerts spec: groups: - name: auth-system rules: - alert: AuthenticationPodCount expr: | count(up{job="auth-service"}) < 2 for: 5m labels: severity: critical annotations: summary: "Insufficient authentication pods"

Prometheus and Kubernetes Events Monitoring

# Example PrometheusRule for monitoring pod evictions apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1 kind: PrometheusRule metadata: name: pod-eviction-alerts spec: groups: - name: pod-evictions rules: - alert: HighPodEvictionRate expr: | sum(rate(kube_pod_deleted{reason="Evicted"}[5m])) > 0.1 for: 5m labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: High rate of pod evictions detected

Custom Metrics for Application Health

# Example ServiceMonitor for Prometheus apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1 kind: ServiceMonitor metadata: name: app-monitor spec: selector: matchLabels: app: my-app endpoints: - port: metrics

Conclusion

By implementing this resilient architecture:

  1. Pod evictions no longer cause service disruptions
  2. Authentication services remain available during patches
  3. No manual intervention required
  4. Applications maintain continuous operation
  5. User sessions persist across pod restarts

The key to success lies in:

  • Distributed deployment
  • Shared state management
  • Proper health monitoring
  • Automated failover mechanisms
  • Regular testing and validation

This architecture ensures that AWS Fargate patch-related pod evictions become a routine operational event rather than a critical incident requiring immediate attention.